Attorney cites 'anger' in underwear bomb jury pool - Atlanta Journal Constitution
joplinnetnews
National / World News 12:11 p.m. Thursday, October 6, 2011

By ED WHITE

The Associated Press

DETROIT ? A juror has been dismissed just 30 minutes after being selected for the trial of a Nigerian man accused of trying to bring down a plane over Detroit with a bomb in his underwear.

In this courtroom drawing, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab appears in U.S. District Judge Nancy Edmunds' courtroom in Detroit, Tuesday, Oct. 4, 2011. Jury selection in the trial of the Nigerian man accused of trying to bring down a jetliner with a bomb in his underwear got under way in Detroit with a dozen people accepted into the jury pool and four excused. The government alleges Abdulmutallab says he wanted to become a martyr when he boarded Northwest Airlines Flight 253 in Amsterdam on Christmas 2009. In the background is U.S. District (AP Photo/Jerry Lemenu)
In this courtroom drawing, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, left, appears in federal court in Detroit, Tuesday, Oct. 4, 2011 with Anthony Chambers, a lawyer who is assisting him in his defense. Jury selection in the trial of the Nigerian man accused of trying to bring down a jetliner with a bomb in his underwear got under way in Detroit with a dozen people accepted into the jury pool and four excused. The government alleges Abdulmutallab says he wanted to become a martyr when he boarded Northwest Airlines Flight 253 in Amsterdam on Christmas 2009. (AP Photo/Jerry Lemenu)
In this courtroom drawing, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab appears in U.S. District Judge Nancy Edmunds' courtroom in Detroit, Tuesday, Oct. 4, 2011. Jury selection in the trial of the Nigerian man accused of trying to bring down a jetliner with a bomb in his underwear got under way in Detroit with a dozen people accepted into the jury pool and four excused. The government alleges Abdulmutallab says he wanted to become a martyr when he boarded Northwest Airlines Flight 253 in Amsterdam on Christmas 2009. In the background is U.S. District (AP Photo/Jerry Lemenu)

U.S. District Judge Nancy Edmunds on Thursday dismissed the woman who is from the defendant's home country shortly after a final jury was selected.

Edmunds did not explain the dismissal in court.

___

October 06, 2011 12:11 PM EDT

Copyright 2011, The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Source: http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNEZ05u2UpmvOs1RRQ7qxNl-nBWb-A&url=http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/attorney-cites-anger-in-1195433.html

bankruptcy san mateo ca san mateo ca bankruptcy contra costa ca bankruptcy attorney bankruptcy attorney contra costa ca contra costa ca bankruptcy attorneys


States' attorney generals concerned about Express Scripts-Medco merger - STLtoday.com
joplinnetnews

A coalition of state attorneys general have launched an inquiry into the proposed merger of St. Louis-based Express Scripts and pharmacy benefit giant Medco Health Solutions.

The states have voiced their concerns about the planned merger to the Federal Trade Commission, which is scrutinizing the deal to determine whether it complies with antitrust laws and consumer protection goals.

Reuters reported on Thursday that more than 25 states were examining the merger. The news agency quoted James Donahue, the chief deputy attorney general in Pennsylvania, who has led a multistate task force that coordinates antitrust cases and advocates competition before federal and state courts and administrative agencies including the FTC and Justice Department.

An Express Scripts spokesman acknowledged that the company had held discussions with representatives from some of the states.

"We understand there are a number of state attorneys general who are looking into the transaction," said Express Scripts spokesman Thom Gross. "This is an ordinary course for a merger of this nature.

"As is generally the case, they are working in conjunction with the FTC and we have spoken to some of them directly. We will continue to work with the FTC and those states that have requested information."

Gross declined to say what type of information the states were seeking. "We're still expecting to get the deal done in the first half of next year. That hasn't changed," he said. "At this point, we can't speculate on the FTC's timing."

Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster's office is reviewing the merger but called the inquiry routine.

"We are looking at it as we often look at mergers," said office press secretary Nanci Gonder. "At this point we're just reviewing."

The proposed $29.1 billion merger, announced in July, would combine two of the nation's three largest pharmacy benefit managers, double the size of Express Scripts, and produce the largest company in its field. The combined entity would have one third of the multi-billion dollar U.S. market for managing prescriptions for employers and insurers.

Express Scripts reported revenue last year of $111 billion. Medco, based in Franklin Lakes, N.J., had revenue of $66 billion.

Express Scripts has tussled previously with state regulatory agencies.

In 2008, Express Scripts and CIGNA Life Insurance Co. agreed to pay $27 million to settle a lawsuit filed by New York's attorney general that accused the two companies of switching patients to higher-priced or higher profit-margin drugs by contacting their doctor without their knowledge.

The same year, Express Scripts agreed to pay a $9.3 million settlement to a coalition of 29 states, as well as up to $200,000 in reimbursement to patients who incurred expenses related to certain switches regarding cholesterol drugs. The states had accused the pharmacy benefit manager of deceptive business practices. Express Scripts also agreed to make certain disclosures to consumers, doctors and employers about its business practices.

The FTC's Bureau of Competition is tasked with reviewing mergers and acquisitions, and challenging those that would probably lead to higher prices, fewer choices, or less innovation.

Community pharmacists have challenged the proposed merger on the grounds that it will result in part in higher consumer prices and limit consumer choice. In particular, they fear that the combined entity will have more power to steer clients toward receiving their prescriptions through its own mail-order business rather than retail pharmacies.

In a filing lodged at the Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday, Express Scripts stated that the merger talks were initiated by Medco chairman David Snow, who telephoned Express Scripts chairman George Paz on June 10 to discuss the possibility of a business combination. Several weeks later, on July 21, the two companies announced the deal.

Source: http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNFssQIYhw3hlbgg4LjiW3mfDm2L9g&url=http://www.stltoday.com/business/local/article_f0700196-efab-5cea-a618-60f351531ef6.html

oakland ca bankruptcy alameda ca bankruptcy attorney bankruptcy attorney alameda ca alameda ca bankruptcy attorneys alameda ca bankruptcy lawyer


Okla. attorney challenges citizen lawsuit change - RealClearPolitics
joplinnetnews
October 06, 2011The Associated Press

Legislation that makes it more difficult for residents to file a legal action to stop government wrongdoing violates the Oklahoma Constitution and provides increased protection for government corruption, an attorney argued in a lawsuit filed Thursday.

Oklahoma City attorney Jerry Fent is trying to prevent the law from taking effect Nov. 1. He argues in his lawsuit, filed at the Oklahoma Supreme Court, that the plan approved during the last legislative session would make it more difficult for taxpayers to sue over government corruption.

"Why would the Legislature want to do that? Unless they want to make it harder for the taxpayer to find out what the corruption is in the government," Fent said.

Under the proposed new law, the number of signatures required for so-called "qui tam" lawsuits _ or filings by a group of citizens to stop a questionable government action _ would change from 10 taxpayers to 100 registered voters.

Sen. Rob Johnson, who wrote the bill, said the intent was to keep a small group of disgruntled citizens from delaying government projects. He said he believes the new 100-voter requirement is "very reasonable."

Under current law, if such a taxpayer action against government wrongdoing is successful, the resident taxpayer who initiated the suit is entitled to recover half of the value of the money or property that is in dispute as a reward. That provision also was changed under Johnson's bill to allow only for the recovery of reasonable attorney fees and court costs.

"Qui tam" is short for a Latin phrase meaning "one who sues the king and on his own behalf."

Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/news/ap/politics/2011/Oct/06/okla__attorney_challenges_citizen_lawsuit_change.html

contra costa ca bankruptcy attorneys contra costa ca bankruptcy lawyer contra costa ca bankruptcy lawyers bankruptcy attorneys in contra costa ca bankruptcy lawyers contra costa ca


?

Log in

No account? Create an account